Category Archives: Fascism

I F*cking Told You So

07 Friday Mar 2025

Posted by in Fascism, Politics, Trump

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , ,

(Warning for the tragically delicate: “adult” content)

Yeah, so, I fucking told you so. The professional, “adult” way of saying that is something like, “events have evolved along the patterns we previously anticipated”, but I’m fucking done with being an “adult”. I told you that Trump was a fucking fascist; I told you more than once. Ironically enough (assuming I’m using the term “ironically” correctly, which assumption may itself be a bit ironic) Robert O. Paxton, the scholar upon whose work I lean most heavily for my understanding of fascism, was quite slow in acknowledging the fact that Trump is a fascist. The last straw for Paxton was Trump’s ginning up the mob on January 6th in his (previous) last ditch attempt to overthrow the government. It was the invocation of the mob that turned Paxton’s opinion, but Paxton is (I am arguing) in error on this matter. J6 was the time Jabba-the-Trump succeeded in ginning up the mob, it is scarcely the first or only time he made such an attempt or appeal. Trump was and is constantly calling for mob action, whether in the form of beating up someone he dislikes, or more general intimidation tactics. Stochastic terrorism is Jabba’s bread-and-butter. J6 stands out not because it was the first time Jabba made such a call; it stands out because it was the time the mob actually turned out en masse. And as Paxton himself astutely notes, it is not success that makes a fascist movement fascist, it is the fascism itself; the intent, not the achievement.

Realistically, Paxton’s hesitancy is quite understandable and worthy of respect. “Fascism” is one of the most promiscuously abused terms out there, second only to “communism” and “scientific.” So while I do contend that his reluctance was misplaced, I nevertheless recognize that it was misplaced for reasons on intellectual integrity. The fact that even the most cautious expert in the field has now (however reluctantly) acknowledged what I insisted was the case almost 10 years ago is enough for me to take a victory lap, declaring I was right all along (regardless of whether it was only a sadly accurate guess at the time.)

A reminder for those who don’t want to go back and read those earlier posts, fascism is:

… a form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation or victimhood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy and purity, in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive violence and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion.

– Robert O. Paxton, Anatomy of Fascism [4267] Kindle edition.

It might be petty of me to note that this definition makes no mention of the invocation of mob action, but I am feeling petty (and bitter) so I’m going to pretend I didn’t say anything about it. What had been previously lacking in Jabba’s rhetoric was not the call for mob action, but rather the call for external expansion. That has now been radically changed with the Orange Shitgibbon’s demands to seize Canada, Panama, and Greenland.

Jabba is now assisted by the even more racist born-rich illiterate buffoon whose name I’ll not mention here. Let’s call him “Leon Cuck.” As the richest man in the world, Leon is the living demonstration that wealth is absolutely no indication of intelligence, integrity, or decency. For the last 8 or so weeks, President Leon and his neutered lapdog Donald have been destroying the framework of democracy in this country with promiscuous abandon, aided and abetted by members of the Republican party, everyone of whom has had to get reinforced kneepads sewn into their clothing for all the time they spend on them copping Dear Leader’s joint.

Leon’s shiny new disregard for any pretense of legality, the Department Of Unelected Cunts Harming Everything (“DOUCHE”) – enthusiastically manned by his pimple-popping brigade of cultish InCel blackshirts – is going well beyond any mere grab for, and exercise of, hegemonic domination. This is actually new in the history of fascist movements. In the past, fascist programs were aimed at unfettered power, without let or hindrance. But it was power over an intact social infrastructure. Yes, the fascists always aligned themselves with big money; yes, they always suppressed any manner of labor movement, unions, or worker advancement. But they didn’t set out to annihilate them either. Fascists set out to seize the government, not destroy it and all of the citizenry along with it. But that appears to be the path Leon is following.

Of course, Leon is also a fucking moron, and so he’s constantly being caught off guard by his own incompetence. Keep in mind that this individual is nothing more than a born-rich grease-stain like his new best buddy Jabba, a “man” – a term that must be used advisedly – who has never actually created or built anything of his own, but who has only ever leveraged his inherited wealth into taking over other people’s creations and then squeezing more wealth out of those things. Along with Jabba, stripped of his inherited money he is nothing more than a low-rent school yard bully. So it is unclear what he expects to accomplish by destroying the very possibility of economic production, especially since the effects of his actions will ramify around the globe.

This might be a good time to interject a fairly obvious point: Leon is a billionaire many hundreds of times over, yet it is not possible – not even in imagination, never mind reality – to earn a billion dollars. The only way a person can acquire that kind of obscene wealth is through theft, fraud, &/or extortion. (Or maybe marrying and then divorcing someone who has acquired that kind of money.)

Under ordinary circumstances – or even just slightly less outrageously extraordinary ones – we in the US could take some small comfort in the thought that the electoral massacre the Republicans would suffer in the 2026 midterms would finally put a check on Jabba’s and Leon’s rampage. But they have largely achieved the hegemonic domination fascists dream of. Even as a few courts get all pouty-faced and call them naughty boys, there is no agency capable of enforcing any judicial ruling against them. If they back down on any issue, it is purely because the choose to do so, as no one now can compel it of them. And those midterms, will there even be any?

At this point, I rather expect Jabba and Leon to continue to run roughshod over everyone and everything until they finally gin up large scale civil protests. At that point, Jabba calls out the military (the Secretary of Defense and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs are both kneelers) to start shooting people. He then declares a nationwide emergency and suspends the Constitution.

I would like to be proven wrong about this, but I’m beyond holding my breath for anything.

Better in The Original German

23 Tuesday Jul 2024

Posted by in Authoritarians, Donald Trump, Fascism, Project 2025

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

The title refers to a meme going around on social media comparing the Heritage Foundations (“HF” going forward) “Project 2025” (“P25” hereafter) to Hitler’s Mein Kampf. The comparison is apt, as the neo-fascist intentions behind the more recent document are disturbingly obvious. The full text of this horrifying document continues to be downloadable,i but as more people become familiar with its contents it remains to be seen how eager HF will continue to be for people to learn what it actually says.

Critiquing the document from a philosophical, and specifically metaphysical, perspective is not difficult. The bald-faced essentialism dripping from every page is so thick in its presentation, and so breathtakingly infantile in its assumptions that it leaves one wondering how the authors ever even mastered their own toilette, much less earned advanced degrees at presumably respectable universities. One scarcely needs a background in process metaphysics to shred this fatuous, and tediously long (almost 900 pages) piece of pretentious twaddle. Consequently, I’ll waste none of my own time, much less any of yours, saying any more on the matter.

Rather, I want to drill down into a few specifics that will exemplify the general trends of this blueprint for the destruction of the Republic. I’ll have a few words of criticism along the way for critics with whom I might otherwise agree, but who have failed to do their due diligence. This document is too important, and too simply monstrous, to entertain ourselves with vague, histrionic arm wavings and dismissals. I believe it is important that we actually know what we are talking about, and then talk about it with care and accuracy. Let us then turn to the meat and potatoes:

Pages: 1 2

Say Goodbye, It’s Independence Day.*

04 Monday Jul 2022

Posted by in Donald Trump, Fascism, Politics

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, ,

*(A line from a Springsteen song, in case you didn’t know.)

With the “Supreme” Court and it’s viciously ideological rightwing members now stampeding the United States full-tilt to all-out fascism, there is little to celebrate this July 4th. Even if Trump does not run or does not win (for whatever reason, including federal indictments), even if, by some incomprehensible miracle, the moves the court will make in its next session do not entirely erase the majority of voters voices from our political enterprise, matters remain dire.

It is clear that the overwhelming majority of the Republican party has abandoned any pretense of decency, of reason, and most certainly of democracy. Absent a series of what appears, as of this writing, to be highly unlikely events, the experiment that was the United States is done for. So, on this holiday, I leave you with these “postcards.”

(I add this last one for those who think there’s no difference between the two.)

So this evening while you’re testing your luck at whether or not you blow your hand(s) off, and terrorizing the dogs, cats, birds, veterans with PTSD, etc, in your neighborhood with explosive devices, perhaps cast a thought to little things like the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States, and whether these things actually matter to you, or if all you care about is feeling good about white supremacism and other fascist instruments of hegemonic domination.

Not The Same

13 Monday Dec 2021

Posted by in Fascism, Politics, Socialism

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

, ,

A recent interaction on social media reminded me of the widespread – and commonly enough, absolutely willful – ignorance of basic political distinctions that are rampant among so many people in the U.S. In particular, I was rather aggressively informed by an individual whose education ended somewhere in the 4th grade (regardless of how much time they actually spent in school) that communism and fascism were identical. Now, one need not be an especially enlightened thinker to recognize what galactically infantile nonsense on stilts such a clownish identification obviously is, but I thought I would use the moment to challenge myself to generate shoestring characterizations of both that, while undoubtedly insufficient by an expert’s criteria, might still serve as a useful thumbnail sketch for those of us who are not experts.

First, let me state what is implicit in the above: I am not an expert. Social/political philosophy is not any of my areas of scholarly expertise. However, I do have a Ph.D. in philosophy, so I am at once a fairly educated and articulate human being, and I’ve had a better than average exposure to such ideas. So scratching out such rough and ready comparative characterizations is nominally well within my reach. The trick that makes it entertaining for me (and possibly useful for others) is creating such formulations in a short and handy way that provides an adequate indication of each position.

Second, a word of caution: as Aristotle pointed out over 2300 years ago, requiring scientific precision of non-scientific topics is manifestly foolish. The shorter form of this caveat can be summarized as, “definitions are dumb.” Unless you are working in one of the mathematical disciplines (in which group I also include such things as computer programming, theoretical physics, formal logic, and such) then anything presented as a definition is never more than a guiding heuristic, not a rigidly absolute rule. Many people seem not to understand this (or deliberately ignore it in the hope of scoring “points), especially when dealing with matters of politics. Hence, any person demanding rigorous definition of, say, either communism or fascism is either guilty of ignorance, disingenuousness, or both. Hence my insistence that what follows are “guidelines,” “characterizations,” “sketches,” and the like. So let us begin.

Pages: 1 2 3

Year of the Plague 3: Against Stupidity…

05 Tuesday May 2020

Posted by in COVID-19, fallacies, Fascism, Logic, Plague

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

, , ,

… the gods themselves contend in vain.i

The COVID-19 pandemic has proven to be a field day for the cognitively challenged; and the more galactically egregious the “challenge,” the more indefensibly extreme has been the response. Infantile stupidity in this instance seems to break out roughly into two major groups that roughly correspond to the origins of the novel coronavirus (these, in turn, seem overwhelmingly to take the form of conspiracy theories of one kind or another), the other major class being purported “cures” that vary from the semi-serious to the dangerously crackpot. The semi-serious versions have, at this time, almost all been shown to be dangerously crackpot when actually employed on any scale, so the difference is entirely a matter of degree rather than kind.gif-leslie-nielsen-nothing-to-see-here-2

Quite aside from the general disregard for trivially simple facts relating to the pandemic itself, these “source” and “cure” stupidities (one might even call them “before” and “after”) actively add additional layers of danger and risk to people’s lives. The “before” group, dominated as it is by conspiracy theories, is more than capable of singling out some one or few individuals as “the reason” for the disease. Such people can then have their lives torn apart by invasive internet searches and statements, inspiring acts of stochastic terrorism against purely innocent persons. Recall, for example, the self-appointed “hero” from North Carolina who traveled to DC with firearms to put an end to the non-existent child-trafficking ring Hillary Clinton was supposedly operating, the “basement” of a pizza parlor that had no basement. Nothing more than the bare, abstract possibility (never mind actual fact) of intelligence would have sufficed to see through the infantile nonsense of the whole “pizzagate” fabrication. But intelligence is never as sexy or exciting as the vicious lies that prop up conspiracy theories. Continue reading →

What’s In a Name?

20 Tuesday Nov 2018

Posted by in Community, Fascism, Politics

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, ,

A great many persons who manifest what Altemeyer has called the “right wing authoritarian” type of mindset will also, often enough, display some rather strikingly childish, if not downright infantile, traits with respect to basic cognition. In particular, among this group one will find many persons who will insist that the contemporary GOP retains its status as “the party of Lincoln,” or that the Nazis were “really socialists” because the word “sozialismus” appears in their name. In both instances there is nothing more than a name in common between the one thing (Lincoln did belong to what was then called the Republican party) and the other (today’s GOP is absolutely tarred by Trump and his blatant fascism.) The laughable rubes who make this association – often enough loudly and in public, with utter self-assurance not to be impinged upon by any shred of logic, principles, evidence, or facts – might otherwise be dismissed as merely uneducable and pathetic, were it not at least one aspect of their behavior that is worthy of note: their use of names, as exemplified above, is magical. And not “magical” in the benevolent sense of “charming,” “truly special,” or “delightful,” but magical in the primitive and pernicious sense of actual magic – specifically, “name magic.”Wizard

There is a connection between magical thinking and fascism, one that has been recognized for some time now. Ernst Cassirer addressed this connection in his important work, The Myth of the State.i Published at the end of WWII (and shortly after Cassirer himself died), Cassirer applied his enormous insights regarding symbolism and modes of thought (his three volume The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms remains an unparalleled intellectual achievement) to the forms of mythological thinking that were such a driving force behind nationalism and fascism. (Cassirer was Jewish and an eye witness to the rise of Nazism in Germany. Seeing the writing on the wall, he was able to escape with wife, going first to Sweden, then England, and finally the United States, where he wrote Myth of the State while working at Columbia University.) As such, it is also a valuable source of insight into our own Trumpistas, and their unflagging devotion to “Dear Leader.” Continue reading →

What is Populism?

06 Monday Aug 2018

Posted by in Critical Thinking, Fascism, Metaphysics, Politics

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

, , , ,

The question came up on social media, What is populism? I had my own little St. Augustine moment, where I realized that, as long as no one asked me, I knew exactly what I meant by the term, but as soon as someone asked I had no idea. (In fairness to Augustine, his moment was around the significantly more subtle notion of “what is time?”) I could run off to the dictionary and waste people’s time by quoting that, but I won’t. For one thing, the dictionary (like Wikipedia itself) is not the answer to a question (other than “how do I spell this word?”), it is the starting point for asking questions. Further, dictionary answers aren’t always that well considered. Thus, the dictionary will tell you that an ad hominem fallacy occurs any time you say something bad about a person, ignoring the fact that, in order to be an actual fallacy, it must be either irrelevant or untrue (or both). Finally I’ve enough acquaintance with the word “populism” via use – both my own and other peoples – that the dictionary will either tell me nothing new or, like ad hominem, tell me something wrong.Mob action

After I make of quick gloss of the sorts of things that populism is at an absolute minimum, I’ll go on to suggest two different developments of the idea. One development leaves populism as a relatively “morally neutral” political method or technique, while the other will put it squarely in the negatives as a substantially fascist instrument. Neither one of these approaches represents the “truth” about populism, or the “real definition”; they are simply different ways in which the word can be used, ways that should never be conflated. I’ll finish with some thoughts from Whitehead and Dewey about the philosophical underpinnings of the kinds of popular relationalism that strengthen genuine democracy. Continue reading →

Mothers of the Disappeared

20 Wednesday Jun 2018

Posted by in Ethics, Fascism, Moral Law

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

, ,

Anyone defending Trump’s concentration camps on the ground that “there aren’t gas chambers”, has only convicted themselves of absolute moral bankruptcy. These same people will still be justifying these concentration camps when there ARE gas chambers.

 

Children Auschwitz

Trump’s recent EO is irrelevant to the above, which was true long before that EO was ever signed. Such persons have shown their true colors. And that EO only nominally stops the further sepAration (note the spelling, which Trump managed to fuck up); it does nothing to address those who have already been herded into the camps, many of whom have long since been entirely lost in the system.

Argumentum ad Baculum

12 Friday Jan 2018

Posted by in Academia, Bullying, Critical Thinking, Fascism, Power, Professoriate, Social Media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , ,

According to the American Association of University Professors (as reported by CNN), “In the last year, more than 100 incidents of targeted harassment against professors have been reported on college campuses.” These reactions have reached the level of actual death threats, so that some professors have been banned from campuses, so as not to expose the rest of the community to potential violence. This is not the kind of situation that would be rendered more secure by everyone carrying guns, since that would erase the distinction between the “good guys” and the “bad guys,” a distinction that would NOT become clearer once someone started shooting, since no one would know who started shooting first, or if it was a “bad guy” or “good guy” that started it. This is why, happy as I would be for permanent employment, I would never accept employment at a college or university that permitted any form of civilian “carry” on campus: a wild-eyed pack of posturing, untrained rubes with deadly weapons at the ready makes no one safer; it takes a special kind of stupid to imagine otherwise.

Closed

But here we find ourselves in a situation where professors are receiving enormous volumes of vicious, if not always credible, threats upon their very lives for the kinds of things they have said in public. How did all these poor little, anonymous (because the cowards are always anonymous), tragically butthurt babies come to decide that the legitimate response to the public expression of a reasoned conclusion (I avoid the vacuous notion of “opinion”) is a threat of violence or even death? Certainly the election of the “crypto”-fascist Trump has energized many white supremacist and neo-nazi groups and sympathizers, and silencing by way of the threat (or act) of violence has long been a favored technique of such people. Which brings us to the title of this post, which is the fallacy of the argumentum ad baculum, the “argument from the stick”: using threats of violence and other forms of intimidation to compel others to accept your position. Continue reading →

The “Savage” Mind

31 Saturday Dec 2016

Posted by in Community, Donald Trump, Fascism, John Dewey, Martin Luther King

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

,

The phrase that opens this post is one that has been around for some time. Claude Levi-Strauss used it as the title to what has since become his most famous, and possibly most important, book. Even in 1962, when the book came out, one could use such a phrase without irony and be accepted as a scholar. These days, the imputation of a “savage mentality” is likely to be met with considerable resistance, and general antipathy (at least from those with a more liberal political orientation.) “Savage” is a pejorative term, and its application (especially in matters of thought and mentality) was almost always applied to aboriginal peoples whom colonial invaders (almost always of European descent) wished to demean, degrade, and – rather savagely – exploit. Such attitudes have been quite rightfully (even righteously, in the non-pejorative sense of that word) denounced for many decades now.trump-rally-nazi-salute

Nevertheless, I submit that there really is such a thing as a savage mind, where such a mentality is understood as an antithesis to that of a civilized mind. It is an example of the genetic fallacy to reject the term because it has been seriously abused in the past. This is not a comparison between persons in pre-scientific, non-technological, &/or aboriginal societies and our own, “gloriously” developed Western cultures. Rather, I submit that the distinguishing characteristic of savagery is its rejection of community in various forms and to varying degrees. Continue reading →