As I’ve noted, I’m consumed by several projects of my own that prevent me from engaging in any substantive blogging for the moment. However, the folks over at S&R have done a nice job of logical analysis that deserves to be widely shared.
Eight related commentaries written by Tom Harris of the International Climate Science Coalition since mid-December are packed them with distortions, errors, hypocrisy, and more.
Tom Harris, Executive Director of the International Climate Science Coalition (ICSC) Tom Harris, Executive Director of the International Climate Science Coalition (ICSC) Starting in the middle of December, 2014 and continuing through February, 2015, Tom Harris, Executive Director of the industrial climate disruptionA denying International Climate Science Coalition (ICSC), wrote at least eight nearly identical commentaries. They were published mostly in small local newspapers and websites around the United States, Canada, and South Africa. The stated purpose of the commentaries was to call for scholars and philosophers to engage in the public argument over climate disruption (aka global warming or climate change), and Harris wrote that “philosophers and other intellectuals have an ethical obligation to speak out loudly when they see fundamental errors in thinking
View original post 3,080 more words